Billion dollar developer lawsuit to proceed, despite Apple objection

Share via:


A UK court has ruled that a near billion dollar developer lawsuit against Apple will be allowed to proceed, after the iPhone maker attempted to get it dismissed.

The £785M ($979M) antitrust lawsuit was filed on behalf of more than 1,500 British developers, and alleges that Apple’s monopolistic control of the market for iPhone apps allowed the company to charge ‘abusive’ levels of commission on app sales …

It’s the usual accusation

The basis of the case is of course a familiar one. It’s the reason Apple has been required to allow third-party app stores in the European Union, and one of the (many!) reasons the Cupertino company is facing a DOJ antitrust case in the US.

Namely, edge cases aside, there has been no way for a developer to sell an iPhone app to a consumer without doing so through the official App Store. Apple is therefore free to impose whatever terms it likes, and charge whatever commissions it pleases, and developers have to simply take it it leave it.

That is now changing in EU countriesthough not in a way that is likely to pass muster by regulators – but remains the case in the UK, US, and the rest of the world.

The near billion dollar developer lawsuit

The lawsuit was filed last summer.

The UK lawsuit at the Competition Appeal Tribunal is being brought by Sean Ennis, a professor at the Centre for Competition Policy at the University of East Anglia and a former economist at the OECD, on behalf of 1,566 app developers.

“Apple’s charges to app developers are excessive, and only possible due to its monopoly on the distribution of apps onto iPhones and iPads,” Ennis said in a statement. “The charges are unfair in their own right, and constitute abusive pricing.”

Apple failed to get it dismissed

Apple filed a motion calling on the judge to dismiss the case, arguing that a UK court should only be able to rule on commissions charged from UK sales, not from global ones.

Reuters reports that the judge rejected this argument, and ruled that the case will be heard.

[Apple] lawyer Daniel Piccinin argued at a hearing in January that developers cannot have a claim in the UK unless they were charged on purchases made through the UK App Store. But the company’s bid to throw out that part of the case was rejected on Friday.

Judge Andrew Lenon said in a written ruling that Ennis’ lawyers had a realistic prospect of establishing that “Apple’s overcharging of commission to app developers based in the UK in relation to commerce transacted on non-UK storefronts did amount to conduct implemented in the UK”.

Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Billion dollar developer lawsuit to proceed, despite Apple objection


A UK court has ruled that a near billion dollar developer lawsuit against Apple will be allowed to proceed, after the iPhone maker attempted to get it dismissed.

The £785M ($979M) antitrust lawsuit was filed on behalf of more than 1,500 British developers, and alleges that Apple’s monopolistic control of the market for iPhone apps allowed the company to charge ‘abusive’ levels of commission on app sales …

It’s the usual accusation

The basis of the case is of course a familiar one. It’s the reason Apple has been required to allow third-party app stores in the European Union, and one of the (many!) reasons the Cupertino company is facing a DOJ antitrust case in the US.

Namely, edge cases aside, there has been no way for a developer to sell an iPhone app to a consumer without doing so through the official App Store. Apple is therefore free to impose whatever terms it likes, and charge whatever commissions it pleases, and developers have to simply take it it leave it.

That is now changing in EU countriesthough not in a way that is likely to pass muster by regulators – but remains the case in the UK, US, and the rest of the world.

The near billion dollar developer lawsuit

The lawsuit was filed last summer.

The UK lawsuit at the Competition Appeal Tribunal is being brought by Sean Ennis, a professor at the Centre for Competition Policy at the University of East Anglia and a former economist at the OECD, on behalf of 1,566 app developers.

“Apple’s charges to app developers are excessive, and only possible due to its monopoly on the distribution of apps onto iPhones and iPads,” Ennis said in a statement. “The charges are unfair in their own right, and constitute abusive pricing.”

Apple failed to get it dismissed

Apple filed a motion calling on the judge to dismiss the case, arguing that a UK court should only be able to rule on commissions charged from UK sales, not from global ones.

Reuters reports that the judge rejected this argument, and ruled that the case will be heard.

[Apple] lawyer Daniel Piccinin argued at a hearing in January that developers cannot have a claim in the UK unless they were charged on purchases made through the UK App Store. But the company’s bid to throw out that part of the case was rejected on Friday.

Judge Andrew Lenon said in a written ruling that Ennis’ lawyers had a realistic prospect of establishing that “Apple’s overcharging of commission to app developers based in the UK in relation to commerce transacted on non-UK storefronts did amount to conduct implemented in the UK”.

Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Arthur Hayes’ ‘sub $50K’ Bitcoin call, Mt. Gox CEO’s...

Arthur Hayes revealed he “took a cheeky short”...

Five things to expect with Apple’s new M4 Mac...

Apple is expected to begin unveiling their M4...

Telegram reportedly ‘inundated’ with illegal and extremist activity

A New York Times analysis of more than...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!