Will you buy an ultra-thin iPhone 17 if battery life is reduced? [Poll]

Share via:


We learned new details about what Apple may ship as the new high-end iPhone in 2025 with a redesigned ultra-thin form factor. But with that change, we could see shorter battery life, particularly compared to the Pro Max model. Would an ultra-thin design be worth it to you at the expense of a smaller battery?

In early May, Jeff Pu predicted the iPhone 17 line would ditch the Plus model for a new “Slim” version. Then The Information released a report going more in-depth on the alleged details saying the 2025 slim iPhone would be “significantly thinner” than current iPhones and also be more expensive than the Pro Max.

Along with the super thin design, the new premium iPhone 17 is expected to be somewhere between 6.12 and 6.69 inches for the display – no bigger than the current Pro Max models.

Without going larger and being “significantly thinner,” Apple will either have to make some battery tech or efficiency improvements or choose the trade-off of shorter battery life.

For reference, here’s the current iPhone 15 lineup battery ratings per Apple:

iPhone 15 lineup battery life

iPhone 15 Pro Max iPhone 15 Pro iPhone 15 Plus iPhone 15
Battery for video playback 29 hours 23 hours 26 hours 20 hours
Battery for audio playback 95 hours 75 hours 100 hours 80 hours

Those who pick an iPhone 15 or 15 Pro over a Pro Max or Plus already choose shorter battery life to get a more compact smartphone. And those still offer an all-day battery for most people.

So maybe it won’t be that big of a deal to go for an ultra-thin iPhone with a smaller battery?

What do you think? Will you go for an ultra-thin iPhone at the expense of battery life? Share in the poll and comments below!

Top image by 9to5Mac

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Will you buy an ultra-thin iPhone 17 if battery life is reduced? [Poll]


We learned new details about what Apple may ship as the new high-end iPhone in 2025 with a redesigned ultra-thin form factor. But with that change, we could see shorter battery life, particularly compared to the Pro Max model. Would an ultra-thin design be worth it to you at the expense of a smaller battery?

In early May, Jeff Pu predicted the iPhone 17 line would ditch the Plus model for a new “Slim” version. Then The Information released a report going more in-depth on the alleged details saying the 2025 slim iPhone would be “significantly thinner” than current iPhones and also be more expensive than the Pro Max.

Along with the super thin design, the new premium iPhone 17 is expected to be somewhere between 6.12 and 6.69 inches for the display – no bigger than the current Pro Max models.

Without going larger and being “significantly thinner,” Apple will either have to make some battery tech or efficiency improvements or choose the trade-off of shorter battery life.

For reference, here’s the current iPhone 15 lineup battery ratings per Apple:

iPhone 15 lineup battery life

iPhone 15 Pro Max iPhone 15 Pro iPhone 15 Plus iPhone 15
Battery for video playback 29 hours 23 hours 26 hours 20 hours
Battery for audio playback 95 hours 75 hours 100 hours 80 hours

Those who pick an iPhone 15 or 15 Pro over a Pro Max or Plus already choose shorter battery life to get a more compact smartphone. And those still offer an all-day battery for most people.

So maybe it won’t be that big of a deal to go for an ultra-thin iPhone with a smaller battery?

What do you think? Will you go for an ultra-thin iPhone at the expense of battery life? Share in the poll and comments below!

Top image by 9to5Mac

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Anthropic proposes a new way to connect data to...

Anthropic is proposing a new standard for connecting AI...

CarTrade Shares Hit A Fresh 52-Week High At INR...

SUMMARY Shares of CarTrade extended gains for the second...

VNG founder Le Hong Minh steps down as CEO

VNG employs around 3,600 people across 11 cities...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!