The SEBI notices are reportedly related to Sharma’s alleged non-compliance with promoter classification norms
The probe was initiated based on inputs from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which also examined Paytm Payments Bank earlier this year
Paytm did not respond to Inc42’s query on the recent developments
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has reportedly issued show-cause notices to Paytm
founder Vijay Shekhar Sharma and board members who served during the initial public offering of its parent entity One 97 Communications in November 2021.
Now, there are reportedly allegations of misrepresentation of facts against the company.
As per Moneycontrol’s report, the notices are related to Sharma’s alleged non-compliance with promoter classification norms on whether the Paytm boss should have been classified as a promoter rather than an employee while filing the IPO documents.
People aware of the matter informed the publication that the probe was initiated based on inputs from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). It is pertinent to note that the central bank had also examined Paytm Payments Bank earlier this year and clamped down on several of its businesses.
Paytm did not respond to Inc42’s query on the recent developments about the show cause notices from the SEBI.
Meanwhile, the media report said that Sharma would have been ineligible for employee stock options (ESOPs) after the company’s listing on the bourses as SEBI regulations prohibit promoters from receiving ESOPs after IPO.
“SEBI is taking the view that Sharma should have been classified as a promoter, and it was also the fiduciary duty of board members of the company to verify the accuracy of the claims made by the founder and attest the same,” a person was quoted as saying.
Meanwhile, the person said that SEBI steps to also go after the directors of a company and trying to hold them responsible for a potential compliance lapse, in the past, is a rare case.
Also, it is worth noting that the matter has come into focus almost three years after Paytm went for the IPO and these alleged lapses were not pointed out earlier by bankers or statutory auditors.
In January last year, proxy advisory firm Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IiAS) raised concerns that Paytm could be bypassing laws to grant ESOPs to its founder and CEO Sharma. Back then, IiAS directly pointed out concerns on whether Sharma met the definition of a promoter under the SEBI norms, and if his direct or indirect cumulative shareholding in the fintech major was less than 10%.
After all, Sharma kept holding more shares in the company via the company’s family trust named VSS Holdings Trust
Just before filing its IPO document with SEBI, Sharma had transferred 5% of his shareholding to VSS Holdings Trust, bringing down his direct shareholding in the company to 9.6%.
The fintech major has been under severe regulatory turmoil in the recent past. While by mid-2023, Paytm was getting on track to achieve profitability, the company had to rejig its lending business due to RBI regulations on unsecured loans, which adversely impacted its Q4 FY24 numbers.
The situation became worse after RBI’s action on Paytm Payments Bank.
Meanwhile, it also received a show cause notice from SEBI concerning the 2.1 Cr ESOP granted to Sharma in the fiscal year ended March 2022. Most recently, it has been slapped with a fine of INR 47.12 Lakh for failing to pay stamp duties pertaining to the allotment of equity shares.
SEBI chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch said recently that the markets regulator will ensure adequate oversight to prevent a “Paytm-type contamination”.
