X drops Unilever from its ‘advertiser boycott’ lawsuit

Share via:


X is dropping claims against Unilever in its lawsuit that accuses advertisers and brands of participating in an “illegal boycott” of the company. The claims against Unilever, which owns household names like Dove and Hellmann’s, were dismissed today.

This is just one of the lawsuits Musk has filed against critics and former business partners, as he’s also suing OpenAI and founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman for the second time. (Musk previously filed and then dropped a similar suit earlier this year.)

On X, the platform’s office account stated it had “reached an agreement” with Unilever and will “continue [its] partnership” with the company. X didn’t immediately respond to questions about the agreement or terms or what it meant by the “ecosystem-wide solution” it referenced in its X post. Unilever declined to comment on the record. The suit still names CVS, Mars, and Ørsted.

The advertiser antitrust suit filed this summer targeted the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), which had led an industry initiative called the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM). Under the GARM agreement, brands refused to advertise on platforms that fell short of certain safety standards. In its suit, X claimed that WFA and other named brands like Unilever conspired to “collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from the platform. Perplexingly, X also said it had joined GARM about a month before it sued WFA.

Shortly after the X lawsuit, GARM announced it was discontinuing its operations, saying, “GARM is a small, not-for-profit initiative, and recent allegations that unfortunately misconstrue its purpose and activities have caused a distraction and significantly drained its resources and finances.”



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

X drops Unilever from its ‘advertiser boycott’ lawsuit


X is dropping claims against Unilever in its lawsuit that accuses advertisers and brands of participating in an “illegal boycott” of the company. The claims against Unilever, which owns household names like Dove and Hellmann’s, were dismissed today.

This is just one of the lawsuits Musk has filed against critics and former business partners, as he’s also suing OpenAI and founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman for the second time. (Musk previously filed and then dropped a similar suit earlier this year.)

On X, the platform’s office account stated it had “reached an agreement” with Unilever and will “continue [its] partnership” with the company. X didn’t immediately respond to questions about the agreement or terms or what it meant by the “ecosystem-wide solution” it referenced in its X post. Unilever declined to comment on the record. The suit still names CVS, Mars, and Ørsted.

The advertiser antitrust suit filed this summer targeted the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), which had led an industry initiative called the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM). Under the GARM agreement, brands refused to advertise on platforms that fell short of certain safety standards. In its suit, X claimed that WFA and other named brands like Unilever conspired to “collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from the platform. Perplexingly, X also said it had joined GARM about a month before it sued WFA.

Shortly after the X lawsuit, GARM announced it was discontinuing its operations, saying, “GARM is a small, not-for-profit initiative, and recent allegations that unfortunately misconstrue its purpose and activities have caused a distraction and significantly drained its resources and finances.”



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Can Blinkit 2.0 Fight Off Quick Commerce Rivals?

Quick commerce has revitalised Indian ecommerce like nothing...

Ola Electric’s Q2 loss narrows as revenue jumps almost...

Ola Electric's net loss narrowed in the second quarter...

Leap close to profit, sales hop to $76m

Recent years have been brutal for edtech startups....

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!