Physicists Revive 150-Year-Old ‘Knot’ Theory to Explain Matter-Antimatter Mystery

Share via:



For various, typically historical reasons, even the best physicists claim things that sound egregious to modern observers. That doesn’t necessarily mean these ideas are completely useless—if anything, theories once dismissed might just be what scientists need to break a stalemate in existential physics.

Writing for Physical Review Letters, a team of Japanese physicists does exactly that, offering a new interpretation of an 1867 theory describing atoms as “knots” in the aether. The paper…



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Physicists Revive 150-Year-Old ‘Knot’ Theory to Explain Matter-Antimatter Mystery



For various, typically historical reasons, even the best physicists claim things that sound egregious to modern observers. That doesn’t necessarily mean these ideas are completely useless—if anything, theories once dismissed might just be what scientists need to break a stalemate in existential physics.

Writing for Physical Review Letters, a team of Japanese physicists does exactly that, offering a new interpretation of an 1867 theory describing atoms as “knots” in the aether. The paper…



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

My go-to Lululemon picks for any workout

Lululemon is my go-to brand for workouts. I've been...

MacBook Pro vs. MacBook Air: Which Apple laptop you...

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred...

NYC Inauguration Bans Raspberry Pi, Flipper Zero Devices

Longtime Slashdot reader ptorrone writes: The January 1, 2026,...

Popular