Intel officially data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-takes-the-wraps-off-panther-lake-first-18a-client-processor-brings-the-best-of-lunar-lake-and-arrow-lake-together-in-one-package” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-takes-the-wraps-off-panther-lake-first-18a-client-processor-brings-the-best-of-lunar-lake-and-arrow-lake-together-in-one-package”>took the wraps off Panther Lake two weeks ago, and even though we already did our deep dive into the family’s architecture, something far more arbitrary has still not been cleared up — the naming scheme. Last week, data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-panther-lake-skus-spotted-in-hwmonitor-update-release-notes-specify-core-ultra-x-h-and-u-variants” target=”_blank” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-panther-lake-skus-spotted-in-hwmonitor-update-release-notes-specify-core-ultra-x-h-and-u-variants”>HWMonitor got updated to add support for Panther Lake, from where we learned the purported models that make up the lineup. Now, we have fresh news, courtesy of a data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/compute/5070240″ target=”_blank” data-url=”https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/compute/5070240″ referrerpolicy=”no-referrer-when-downgrade” data-hl-processed=”none”>new Geekbench listing, that somewhat refutes part of that, potentially clearing the air for Panther Lake’s…
