After months of anticipation (and a few delays), data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/what-is-grokipedia-elon-musk-just-delayed-his-wikipedia-rival-heres-why” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/what-is-grokipedia-elon-musk-just-delayed-his-wikipedia-rival-heres-why”>Grokipedia, data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomsguide.com/tag/elon-musk” data-auto-tag-linker=”true” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomsguide.com/tag/elon-musk”>Elon Musk’s long-promised AI-powered encyclopedia, is finally live. What seems like a glorified data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/what-is-grok” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/what-is-grok”>Grok, the platform is marketed as a “truth-seeking” alternative to Wikipedia. It promises real-time accuracy, free speech and fewer ideological blind spots.
Naturally, I wanted to know if Grokipedia could really out-inform the internet’s reigning reference giant. So I pitted Grokipedia and Wikipedia head-to-head across seven categories. From…
