Delaware judge won’t speed up Paramount lawsuit seeking Warner Bros merger details

Share via:



A ⁠Delaware judge on Thursday rejected Paramount Skydance‘s bid to expedite its lawsuit demanding more information from Warner Bros Discovery about how that company decided Netflix’s proposed $82.7 billion takeover was better than its own $108.7 billion hostile bid.

Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn of the ‌Delaware Chancery Court ‌said at a hearing that Paramount did not show it would suffer “cognizable irreparable harm” without the financial details it sought.

Warner Bros rejected Paramount’s ‌takeover offer on January 7 and urged shareholders to…



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Delaware judge won’t speed up Paramount lawsuit seeking Warner Bros merger details



A ⁠Delaware judge on Thursday rejected Paramount Skydance‘s bid to expedite its lawsuit demanding more information from Warner Bros Discovery about how that company decided Netflix’s proposed $82.7 billion takeover was better than its own $108.7 billion hostile bid.

Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn of the ‌Delaware Chancery Court ‌said at a hearing that Paramount did not show it would suffer “cognizable irreparable harm” without the financial details it sought.

Warner Bros rejected Paramount’s ‌takeover offer on January 7 and urged shareholders to…



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Exclusive eBook: How AGI Became a Consequential Conspiracy Theory

In this exclusive subscriber-only eBook, you’ll learn about how...

Top Career Advice of 2025

This article is crossposted from IEEE Spectrum’s careers newsletter....

Is a billion dollars still cool?

In the 2010 film “The Social Network,” early Facebook...

Popular

iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv iptv