Everyone’s obsessing over which data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomsguide.com/features/5-best-ai-video-generators-tested-and-compared” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomsguide.com/features/5-best-ai-video-generators-tested-and-compared”>AI video generator produces the prettiest pixels, but they’re missing the point entirely. The real battleground between data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomsguide.com/tag/openai” data-auto-tag-linker=”true” data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomsguide.com/tag/openai”>OpenAI‘s data-analytics-id=”inline-link” href=”https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/ai-image-video/sora-2-is-everything-thats-wrong-with-ai-heres-why-im-sticking-with-veo-3″ data-before-rewrite-localise=”https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/ai-image-video/sora-2-is-everything-thats-wrong-with-ai-heres-why-im-sticking-with-veo-3″>Sora 2 and Google’s Veo 3.1 isn’t visual fidelity — it’s audio sophistication and spatial realism.
Both models have their quirks. Sora 2’s Cameo feature lets you place yourself in scenes beautifully. Veo 3.1 nails cross-scene consistency. But their real value is audio, and both are surprisingly good at it. Unlike other models where audio is an…
