Meta (again) denies that Netflix read users’ private Facebook messages

Share via:


Meta is denying that it gave Netflix access to users’ private messages. The claim recently began circulating on X after X owner Elon Musk amplified multiple posts about the matter by replying “Wow” and “Yup.” The claim references a court filing that emerged as part of the discovery process in a class-action lawsuit over data privacy practices between a group of consumers and Facebook’s parent, Meta.

The document alleges that Netflix and Facebook had a “special relationship” and that Facebook even cut spending on original programming for its Facebook Watch video service so as not to compete with Netflix, a large Facebook advertiser. It also says that Netflix had access to Meta’s “Inbox API” that offered the streamer “programmatic access to Facebook’s user’s private message inboxes.”

This is the part of the claim that Musk responded to in posts on X, leading to a chorus of angry replies about how Facebook user data was for sale, so to speak.

Meta, for its part, is denying the accuracy of the document’s claims.

Meta’s communications director, Andy Stone, reposted the original X post on Tuesday with a statement disputing that Netflix had been given access to users’ private messages.

“Shockingly untrue,” Stone wrote on X. “Meta didn’t share people’s private messages with Netflix. The agreement allowed people to message their friends on Facebook about what they were watching on Netflix, directly from the Netflix app. Such agreements are commonplace in the industry.”

In other words, Meta is claiming that Netflix did have programmatic access to users’ inboxes, but did not use that access to read private messages.

Beyond Stone’s X post, Meta has not provided further comment.

However, The New York Times had previously reported in 2018 that Netflix and Spotify could read users’ private messages, according to documents it had obtained. Meta denied those claims at the time via a blog post titled “Facts About Facebook’s Messaging Partnerships” where it explained that Netflix and Spotify had access to APIs that allowed consumers to message friends about what they were listening to on Spotify or watching on Netflix directly from those companies’ respective apps. This required the companies to have “write access” to compose messages to friends, “read access” to allow users to read messages back from friends, and “delete access,” which meant if you deleted a message from the third-party app, it would also delete the message from Facebook.

“No third party was reading your private messages, or writing messages to your friends without your permission. Many news stories imply we were shipping over private messages to partners, which is not correct,” the blog post stated.

In any event, Messenger didn’t implement default end-to-end encryption until December 2023, a practice that would have made these sorts of claims a non-starter, as it wouldn’t have left room for doubt. The lack of encrypted communications combined with read/write access to message inboxes means there’s no guarantee that messages were protected, even if that wasn’t the focus of the business arrangement.

While Stone is downplaying Netflix’s ability to snoop on private messages, it’s worth noting that the streamer was provided with a level of access that other companies did not have.

The document claims that Netflix had access to Facebook’s “Titan API,” a private API that had allowed it to integrate with Facebook’s messaging app. In exchange for the Inbox API access, Netflix also agreed to provide the social networking company with a “written report every two weeks” with information about its recommendation sends and recipient clicks and agreed to keep its API agreement confidential.

By 2015, Netflix was spending $40 million on Facebook ads, the document says, and was allowing Netflix user data to be used for Facebook ad targeting and optimization. In 2017, Netflix agreed to spend $150 million on Facebook ads and provide the company with “cross-device intent signals.”

Netflix and Facebook maintained a close relationship, with then-Netflix CEO Reed Hastings (and Facebook board member until April 2019) having direct communications with Facebook (Meta) execs including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, COO Sheryl Sandberg, Comms VP Elliot Schrage and CTO Andrew Bosworth.

To maintain Netflix’s advertising business, Zuckerberg himself emailed the head of Facebook Watch, Fidji Simo, in May 2018, to tell her that Watch’s budget for originals and sports was being cut by $750 million as the social network exited from competing directly with Netflix. Facebook had been building the Watch business for two years and had only introduced the Watch tab in the U.S. in August 2017.

Elsewhere in the filing, Meta details how it snooped on Snapchat traffic in secret, among other things.





Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Meta (again) denies that Netflix read users’ private Facebook messages


Meta is denying that it gave Netflix access to users’ private messages. The claim recently began circulating on X after X owner Elon Musk amplified multiple posts about the matter by replying “Wow” and “Yup.” The claim references a court filing that emerged as part of the discovery process in a class-action lawsuit over data privacy practices between a group of consumers and Facebook’s parent, Meta.

The document alleges that Netflix and Facebook had a “special relationship” and that Facebook even cut spending on original programming for its Facebook Watch video service so as not to compete with Netflix, a large Facebook advertiser. It also says that Netflix had access to Meta’s “Inbox API” that offered the streamer “programmatic access to Facebook’s user’s private message inboxes.”

This is the part of the claim that Musk responded to in posts on X, leading to a chorus of angry replies about how Facebook user data was for sale, so to speak.

Meta, for its part, is denying the accuracy of the document’s claims.

Meta’s communications director, Andy Stone, reposted the original X post on Tuesday with a statement disputing that Netflix had been given access to users’ private messages.

“Shockingly untrue,” Stone wrote on X. “Meta didn’t share people’s private messages with Netflix. The agreement allowed people to message their friends on Facebook about what they were watching on Netflix, directly from the Netflix app. Such agreements are commonplace in the industry.”

In other words, Meta is claiming that Netflix did have programmatic access to users’ inboxes, but did not use that access to read private messages.

Beyond Stone’s X post, Meta has not provided further comment.

However, The New York Times had previously reported in 2018 that Netflix and Spotify could read users’ private messages, according to documents it had obtained. Meta denied those claims at the time via a blog post titled “Facts About Facebook’s Messaging Partnerships” where it explained that Netflix and Spotify had access to APIs that allowed consumers to message friends about what they were listening to on Spotify or watching on Netflix directly from those companies’ respective apps. This required the companies to have “write access” to compose messages to friends, “read access” to allow users to read messages back from friends, and “delete access,” which meant if you deleted a message from the third-party app, it would also delete the message from Facebook.

“No third party was reading your private messages, or writing messages to your friends without your permission. Many news stories imply we were shipping over private messages to partners, which is not correct,” the blog post stated.

In any event, Messenger didn’t implement default end-to-end encryption until December 2023, a practice that would have made these sorts of claims a non-starter, as it wouldn’t have left room for doubt. The lack of encrypted communications combined with read/write access to message inboxes means there’s no guarantee that messages were protected, even if that wasn’t the focus of the business arrangement.

While Stone is downplaying Netflix’s ability to snoop on private messages, it’s worth noting that the streamer was provided with a level of access that other companies did not have.

The document claims that Netflix had access to Facebook’s “Titan API,” a private API that had allowed it to integrate with Facebook’s messaging app. In exchange for the Inbox API access, Netflix also agreed to provide the social networking company with a “written report every two weeks” with information about its recommendation sends and recipient clicks and agreed to keep its API agreement confidential.

By 2015, Netflix was spending $40 million on Facebook ads, the document says, and was allowing Netflix user data to be used for Facebook ad targeting and optimization. In 2017, Netflix agreed to spend $150 million on Facebook ads and provide the company with “cross-device intent signals.”

Netflix and Facebook maintained a close relationship, with then-Netflix CEO Reed Hastings (and Facebook board member until April 2019) having direct communications with Facebook (Meta) execs including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, COO Sheryl Sandberg, Comms VP Elliot Schrage and CTO Andrew Bosworth.

To maintain Netflix’s advertising business, Zuckerberg himself emailed the head of Facebook Watch, Fidji Simo, in May 2018, to tell her that Watch’s budget for originals and sports was being cut by $750 million as the social network exited from competing directly with Netflix. Facebook had been building the Watch business for two years and had only introduced the Watch tab in the U.S. in August 2017.

Elsewhere in the filing, Meta details how it snooped on Snapchat traffic in secret, among other things.





Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Can OneAIChat Become The One-Stop Shop For All GenAI...

SUMMARY Founded in 2023, Mangaluru-based OneAIChat aggregates various GenAI...

Ola CEO Bhavish Aggarwal Lashes Out At Staff Over...

Amid reports that Ola is planning to cut around...

H-1B visa changes: H-1B rejig to have mixed impact...

The outgoing US president Joe Biden administration’s H1B...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!