Making iPadOS finally live up to the iPad’s overachieving hardware

Share via:


Every time a new iPad Pro is released, the reviews repeat the same narrative: powerful hardware, hamstrung software. The M4 reviews have been no exception.

This gap isn’t because of a lack of effort on Apple’s part. The company has continually developed and pushed iPadOS forward in the nine years since the iPad Pro debuted. But the general consensus among reviewers is that there’s still a lot of work to do.

But what, exactly, would that work look like? How might the iPad’s software finally make good on the potential of its hardware?

Federico Viticci at MacStories has attempted to answer exactly those questions.

What needs fixing in iPadOS

Viticci has been at the forefront of iPad-first computing for a very long time. He loves the iPad. But he also recognizes the platform’s shortcomings, especially in the software department.

So in anticipation of another wave of iPad Pro reviews repeating the same old story, he prepared a story outlining what exactly it means to him that the iPad’s hardware is let down by iPadOS.

I highly recommend checking out the full story, but here’s an overview of the table of contents to get a glimpse of what all he takes issue with in iPadOS:

  • Missing Apps
  • Not-So-Desktop-Class Apps
  • Files: A Slow, Unreliable File Manager
  • Audio Limitations
  • Multitasking: A Fractured Mess
  • Spotlight
  • Lack of Background Processes and System-Wide Utilities
  • Inefficiency by a Thousand Cuts

I agree wholeheartedly with all the pain points Viticci highlights. They’ll impact different people to varying degrees depending on your computing needs, but they all reflect the reality that many basic functions of macOS are just not possible on the iPad—not even with an M4 chip.

Building software that lives up to the iPad’s potential

Viticci’s conclusion sums it up well:

With new iPad Pros nearly upon us, it’s time to admit that iPadOS is not an operating system of the same caliber as Apple’s new hardware. iPadOS has been the victim of erratic updates over the years, with features that were meant to “reimagine” desktop computing only to get not even halfway there and be left to languish for years. Once again, I am not suggesting that the solution is to put macOS on iPad and call it a day. I’m saying that if that’s not in the cards, then Apple should consider all the ways iPadOS is still failing at basic computing tasks. I’d be okay with iPads running iPadOS forever. But if we passively accept that this is as good as an iPad can get, I strongly believe that we’ll play a role in letting Apple squander the greatest computer form factor they’ve ever created.

What are your thoughts? What are the biggest software limitations you experience when using an iPad? Let us know in the comments.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Making iPadOS finally live up to the iPad’s overachieving hardware


Every time a new iPad Pro is released, the reviews repeat the same narrative: powerful hardware, hamstrung software. The M4 reviews have been no exception.

This gap isn’t because of a lack of effort on Apple’s part. The company has continually developed and pushed iPadOS forward in the nine years since the iPad Pro debuted. But the general consensus among reviewers is that there’s still a lot of work to do.

But what, exactly, would that work look like? How might the iPad’s software finally make good on the potential of its hardware?

Federico Viticci at MacStories has attempted to answer exactly those questions.

What needs fixing in iPadOS

Viticci has been at the forefront of iPad-first computing for a very long time. He loves the iPad. But he also recognizes the platform’s shortcomings, especially in the software department.

So in anticipation of another wave of iPad Pro reviews repeating the same old story, he prepared a story outlining what exactly it means to him that the iPad’s hardware is let down by iPadOS.

I highly recommend checking out the full story, but here’s an overview of the table of contents to get a glimpse of what all he takes issue with in iPadOS:

  • Missing Apps
  • Not-So-Desktop-Class Apps
  • Files: A Slow, Unreliable File Manager
  • Audio Limitations
  • Multitasking: A Fractured Mess
  • Spotlight
  • Lack of Background Processes and System-Wide Utilities
  • Inefficiency by a Thousand Cuts

I agree wholeheartedly with all the pain points Viticci highlights. They’ll impact different people to varying degrees depending on your computing needs, but they all reflect the reality that many basic functions of macOS are just not possible on the iPad—not even with an M4 chip.

Building software that lives up to the iPad’s potential

Viticci’s conclusion sums it up well:

With new iPad Pros nearly upon us, it’s time to admit that iPadOS is not an operating system of the same caliber as Apple’s new hardware. iPadOS has been the victim of erratic updates over the years, with features that were meant to “reimagine” desktop computing only to get not even halfway there and be left to languish for years. Once again, I am not suggesting that the solution is to put macOS on iPad and call it a day. I’m saying that if that’s not in the cards, then Apple should consider all the ways iPadOS is still failing at basic computing tasks. I’d be okay with iPads running iPadOS forever. But if we passively accept that this is as good as an iPad can get, I strongly believe that we’ll play a role in letting Apple squander the greatest computer form factor they’ve ever created.

What are your thoughts? What are the biggest software limitations you experience when using an iPad? Let us know in the comments.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Apple’s AirPort router likely won’t be coming back, but...

According to Mark Gurman’s Power On newsletter, Apple...

Epigamia Cofounder Rohan Mirchandani Passes Away

SUMMARY Rohan Mirchandani, who was 41 years old, passed...

Top-Level VC Exits That Defined The Year Of Startup...

The Indian investor ecosystem was in complete disarray...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!