NCLAT dismissed complaint accusing WhatsApp of predatory pricing

Share via:

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed a complaint accusing WhatsApp of predatory pricing.

The NCLAT’s two-member bench also upheld the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) 2017 order dismissing the complaint alleging abuse of dominant position by the Meta-owned company. An NGO, Fight for Transparency Society, claimed that WhatsApp used predatory pricing tactics by not charging users a subscription fee. According to a PTI report, the NCLAT determined that, while there is no doubt that WhatsApp has a “dominant position,” it has not “abused its dominant position” based on the appellant’s input.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

NCLAT dismissed complaint accusing WhatsApp of predatory pricing

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed a complaint accusing WhatsApp of predatory pricing.

The NCLAT’s two-member bench also upheld the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) 2017 order dismissing the complaint alleging abuse of dominant position by the Meta-owned company. An NGO, Fight for Transparency Society, claimed that WhatsApp used predatory pricing tactics by not charging users a subscription fee. According to a PTI report, the NCLAT determined that, while there is no doubt that WhatsApp has a “dominant position,” it has not “abused its dominant position” based on the appellant’s input.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

NASDAQ CEO Adena Friedman isn’t surprised we haven’t seen...

While many venture investors, and likely their LPs, were hoping...

Bloodbath In New-Age Tech Stocks Amid Broader Market Crash

SUMMARY Of the 28 new-age tech companies under Inc42’s...

tata consultancy services: From competitors to collaborators: Indian IT...

The growing trend of multinationals setting up global...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!