The Epic Games-Apple antitrust battle resumes in appeals court

Share via:

Apple’s antitrust battle against Fortnite maker Epic Games is returning to the courtroom after both sides appealed last year’s ruling in a precedent-setting case over Apple’s alleged anti-competitive behavior.

When ruling that the tech giant was not acting as a monopolist with regard to its App Store practises last year, a U.S. District Court judge largely sided with Apple. Naturally, Epic Games disagreed with that ruling because it had hoped the court would order Apple to accept third-party payments, which would have allowed Fortnite to generate more money. Apple, meanwhile, refused to comply with the court’s order requiring it to allow apps that link to alternate payment methods.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

The Epic Games-Apple antitrust battle resumes in appeals court

Apple’s antitrust battle against Fortnite maker Epic Games is returning to the courtroom after both sides appealed last year’s ruling in a precedent-setting case over Apple’s alleged anti-competitive behavior.

When ruling that the tech giant was not acting as a monopolist with regard to its App Store practises last year, a U.S. District Court judge largely sided with Apple. Naturally, Epic Games disagreed with that ruling because it had hoped the court would order Apple to accept third-party payments, which would have allowed Fortnite to generate more money. Apple, meanwhile, refused to comply with the court’s order requiring it to allow apps that link to alternate payment methods.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Everything we’re expecting from tech’s biggest conference in January

As we hurtle towards the end of the year,...

Google releases Android 16 QPR3 Beta 1.1 with critical...

Edgar Cervantes / Android AuthorityTL;DR Android 16 QPR3 Beta 1.1...

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for Dec....

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Is the Dictionary Done For?

In the late 1980s, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary sat...

Amazon’s Zoox to recall 332 US vehicles over software...

Amazon's self-driving ⁠unit Zoox is recalling 332 vehicles...