Apple wins antitrust court battle with Epic Games, appeals court rules

Share via:

Apple has won its antitrust-focused appeals court battle against Fortnite maker Epic Games over its App Store policies, according to an opinion issued by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday.

The court upheld the district court’s earlier ruling in favor of Apple, which had largely dismissed Epic Games’ antitrust claims. However, it also upheld the lower court’s judgment in favor of Epic under California’s Unfair Competition Law.

The court’s decision is a significant setback for Epic Games and other developers who were hoping the ruling would set a precedent for further antitrust claims and require Apple to open iOS devices to third-party app stores and payment systems. Epic Games had originally sued Apple in 2020 after forcing Apple to remove Fortnite from the App Store for violating the App Store terms over in-app purchases.

Apple largely won the lawsuit when the judge declared that it was not acting as a monopolist, but the court sided with Epic Games on the matter of Apple’s anti-steering policies regarding restrictions on in-app purchases. It said that Apple would no longer be able to prohibit developers from pointing users to other means of payment.

Both Apple and Epic Games appealed the ruling. In its statement following the decision, Apple said the ruling “reaffirms Apple’s resounding victory in this case, with nine of ten claims having been decided in Apple’s favor.” The company added that it was “proud” of the App Store’s contributions to users and developers and that it was considering further review of the court’s ruling on the remaining claim under state law.

The appeals court panel affirmed the district court’s denial of antitrust liability and its corresponding rejection of Epic’s illegality defense to Apple’s breach of contract counter-claim. However, it also noted that the district court had erred in defining the relevant antitrust market and in holding that Apple’s Developer Program Licensing Agreement fell outside the scope of the antitrust law known as the Sherman Act. The panel upheld the district court’s ruling in favor of Epic Games within the scope of California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Overall, the court’s decision largely upholds Apple’s App Store policies and is a significant win for the company. However, it also means that the anti-steering changes the district court previously decided on would once again be required. Apple has not yet issued an appeal for this part of the decision.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Sarthak Luthra
Sarthak Luthra
Hey, there! I am the tech guy. I get things running around here and I post sometimes. ~ naam toh suna hi hoga, ab kaam bhi dekhlo :-)

Popular

More Like this

Apple wins antitrust court battle with Epic Games, appeals court rules

Apple has won its antitrust-focused appeals court battle against Fortnite maker Epic Games over its App Store policies, according to an opinion issued by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday.

The court upheld the district court’s earlier ruling in favor of Apple, which had largely dismissed Epic Games’ antitrust claims. However, it also upheld the lower court’s judgment in favor of Epic under California’s Unfair Competition Law.

The court’s decision is a significant setback for Epic Games and other developers who were hoping the ruling would set a precedent for further antitrust claims and require Apple to open iOS devices to third-party app stores and payment systems. Epic Games had originally sued Apple in 2020 after forcing Apple to remove Fortnite from the App Store for violating the App Store terms over in-app purchases.

Apple largely won the lawsuit when the judge declared that it was not acting as a monopolist, but the court sided with Epic Games on the matter of Apple’s anti-steering policies regarding restrictions on in-app purchases. It said that Apple would no longer be able to prohibit developers from pointing users to other means of payment.

Both Apple and Epic Games appealed the ruling. In its statement following the decision, Apple said the ruling “reaffirms Apple’s resounding victory in this case, with nine of ten claims having been decided in Apple’s favor.” The company added that it was “proud” of the App Store’s contributions to users and developers and that it was considering further review of the court’s ruling on the remaining claim under state law.

The appeals court panel affirmed the district court’s denial of antitrust liability and its corresponding rejection of Epic’s illegality defense to Apple’s breach of contract counter-claim. However, it also noted that the district court had erred in defining the relevant antitrust market and in holding that Apple’s Developer Program Licensing Agreement fell outside the scope of the antitrust law known as the Sherman Act. The panel upheld the district court’s ruling in favor of Epic Games within the scope of California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Overall, the court’s decision largely upholds Apple’s App Store policies and is a significant win for the company. However, it also means that the anti-steering changes the district court previously decided on would once again be required. Apple has not yet issued an appeal for this part of the decision.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

Sarthak Luthra
Sarthak Luthra
Hey, there! I am the tech guy. I get things running around here and I post sometimes. ~ naam toh suna hi hoga, ab kaam bhi dekhlo :-)

More like this

https://pnndigital.com/business-news/samsung-to-consolidate-leadership-in-mid-premium-segment-with-launch-of-galaxy-a55-5g-galaxy-a35-in-india/

https://pnndigital.com/business-news/samsung-to-consolidate-leadership-in-mid-premium-segment-with-launch-of-galaxy-a55-5g-galaxy-a35-in-india/ Source link

Black founders are creating tailored ChatGPTs for a more...

At first, John Pasmore was excited about ChatGPT.  Source...

Evaluating Opportunities Within A Subscription Economy

SUMMARY Companies in a subscription economy rely on recurring...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!