AI language model ChatGPT criticized for providing fake legal citations in lawsuit case

Share via:

ChatGPT, a popular AI innovation, misled a lawyer by providing fake citations of made-up cases in a lawsuit against Avianca, a Colombian airline. Lawyer Steven A Schwartz, representing Roberto Mata, who sued the airline for an injury caused by a serving cart, admitted to using OpenAI’s chatbot for research purposes. The lawyer cited these fictitious cases to support his argument. However, when the opposing counsel discovered the deception, Judge Kevin Castel of the US District Court confirmed that six of the cited cases were “bogus” and demanded an explanation from Schwartz’s legal team.

Judge Castel stated, “Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations.” The lawyer, Schwartz, claimed that he was unaware of the AI’s potential to provide false information and expressed regret over using the AI model without proper caution and validation.

This incident highlights the challenges associated with relying solely on AI tools for legal research. The AI language model, ChatGPT, cited non-existent sources and provided misleading information, leading to serious consequences in the legal proceedings. It raises concerns about the need for human oversight and critical evaluation when utilizing AI technologies in sensitive areas such as law.

This is not the first instance where ChatGPT has generated false information. In another case, the AI model falsely accused a law professor of sexual harassment, citing a non-existent Washington Post article to support its claim. The incident underscores the importance of verifying information from reliable sources and the limitations of AI language models in accurately discerning truth from falsehood.

As AI technologies continue to advance, it is crucial for users to exercise caution and apply rigorous scrutiny when relying on AI-generated content, especially in legal and other high-stakes contexts. The incident involving ChatGPT serves as a reminder that human judgment and critical thinking remain indispensable in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of information.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

AI language model ChatGPT criticized for providing fake legal citations in lawsuit case

ChatGPT, a popular AI innovation, misled a lawyer by providing fake citations of made-up cases in a lawsuit against Avianca, a Colombian airline. Lawyer Steven A Schwartz, representing Roberto Mata, who sued the airline for an injury caused by a serving cart, admitted to using OpenAI’s chatbot for research purposes. The lawyer cited these fictitious cases to support his argument. However, when the opposing counsel discovered the deception, Judge Kevin Castel of the US District Court confirmed that six of the cited cases were “bogus” and demanded an explanation from Schwartz’s legal team.

Judge Castel stated, “Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations.” The lawyer, Schwartz, claimed that he was unaware of the AI’s potential to provide false information and expressed regret over using the AI model without proper caution and validation.

This incident highlights the challenges associated with relying solely on AI tools for legal research. The AI language model, ChatGPT, cited non-existent sources and provided misleading information, leading to serious consequences in the legal proceedings. It raises concerns about the need for human oversight and critical evaluation when utilizing AI technologies in sensitive areas such as law.

This is not the first instance where ChatGPT has generated false information. In another case, the AI model falsely accused a law professor of sexual harassment, citing a non-existent Washington Post article to support its claim. The incident underscores the importance of verifying information from reliable sources and the limitations of AI language models in accurately discerning truth from falsehood.

As AI technologies continue to advance, it is crucial for users to exercise caution and apply rigorous scrutiny when relying on AI-generated content, especially in legal and other high-stakes contexts. The incident involving ChatGPT serves as a reminder that human judgment and critical thinking remain indispensable in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of information.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

1trepreneur – A Startup Community Where Founders Help Founders

Founded in July 2023, 1trepreneur is a yu89drapidly growing...

Philippine fintech firm Salmon secures $30m

This financing round saw participation from the International...

Why OpenAI o1 Sucks at Coding

While the OpenAI’s o1 series of models is...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!