A day after Infosys acknowledged the receipt of a notice for alleged evasion of over Rs 32,000 crore ($3.8 billion) in integrated goods and services tax (IGST), industry body, nasscom said that the recent episode reflects GST enforcement mechanism’s lack of understanding of IT industry operating model. It added that it is not a case of ‘import of service’ by the head office from the branch, as made out to be.

Nasscom in a statement said, “Recent media reports of a GST demand of over Rs 320 billion reflects a lack of understanding of industry’s operating model. This is an industry wide issue, and multiple companies are facing avoidable litigation, uncertainty, concerns from investors and customers.”

The issue at hand involves the applicability of GST through the reverse charge mechanism (RCM). GST enforcement authorities have been issuing notices for remittance by the Indian head office to its foreign branches for cases where there is no service between the head office and the foreign branch for this RCM, ignoring that this is not a case of ‘import of service’ by the head office from the branch, added nasscom.

The association stated, “Accelerating services exports is key to India’s ambition of Viksit Bharat and attracting global tech investment to India. This requires a supportive policy environment and ease of doing business. The government circulars issued based on recommendations of the GST Council must be honoured in enforcement mechanisms so that notices do not create uncertainty and negatively impact perceptions on India’s ease of doing business. It is crucial that compliances obligations are not subject to multiple interpretations.”

This is not a new problem and courts have been ruling in favour of the industry in these cases, said the industry body. “This issue was even addressed during the erstwhile service tax law, where favourable judgments were delivered by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Karnataka High Court has stayed a show cause notice in a similar case for a large IT company.”

Nasscom had requested the Ministry of Finance to issue a circular to clarify the position so that the industry can avoid this litigation risk. “The Government and the GST Council has been supportive and as a result, less than two months ago, a circular was issued exactly to address this issue. This Circular No. 210/4/2024, dated June 26, 2024, states that for the import of services, the deemed open market value of such transactions will be NIL if full input tax credit is available.”

The industry association further asked that these demands should stand addressed by the abovementioned circular, independent of the basic tax position of there being no supply in the first place. “We will continue to pursue with the Government on the need for proper implementation of the government Circular by the enforcement authorities. nasscom remains committed to working with the industry and the government to enable of ease of doing business and achieving the goal of Viksit Bharat.”

A day after Infosys acknowledged the receipt of a notice for alleged evasion of over Rs 32,000 crore ($3.8 billion) in integrated goods and services tax (IGST), industry body, nasscom said that the recent episode reflects GST enforcement mechanism’s lack of understanding of IT industry operating model. It added that it is not a case of ‘import of service’ by the head office from the branch, as made out to be.

Nasscom in a statement said, “Recent media reports of a GST demand of over Rs 320 billion reflects a lack of understanding of industry’s operating model. This is an industry wide issue, and multiple companies are facing avoidable litigation, uncertainty, concerns from investors and customers.”

The issue at hand involves the applicability of GST through the reverse charge mechanism (RCM). GST enforcement authorities have been issuing notices for remittance by the Indian head office to its foreign branches for cases where there is no service between the head office and the foreign branch for this RCM, ignoring that this is not a case of ‘import of service’ by the head office from the branch, added nasscom.

The association stated, “Accelerating services exports is key to India’s ambition of Viksit Bharat and attracting global tech investment to India. This requires a supportive policy environment and ease of doing business. The government circulars issued based on recommendations of the GST Council must be honoured in enforcement mechanisms so that notices do not create uncertainty and negatively impact perceptions on India’s ease of doing business. It is crucial that compliances obligations are not subject to multiple interpretations.”

This is not a new problem and courts have been ruling in favour of the industry in these cases, said the industry body. “This issue was even addressed during the erstwhile service tax law, where favourable judgments were delivered by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Karnataka High Court has stayed a show cause notice in a similar case for a large IT company.”

Nasscom had requested the Ministry of Finance to issue a circular to clarify the position so that the industry can avoid this litigation risk. “The Government and the GST Council has been supportive and as a result, less than two months ago, a circular was issued exactly to address this issue. This Circular No. 210/4/2024, dated June 26, 2024, states that for the import of services, the deemed open market value of such transactions will be NIL if full input tax credit is available.”

The industry association further asked that these demands should stand addressed by the abovementioned circular, independent of the basic tax position of there being no supply in the first place. “We will continue to pursue with the Government on the need for proper implementation of the government Circular by the enforcement authorities. nasscom remains committed to working with the industry and the government to enable of ease of doing business and achieving the goal of Viksit Bharat.”