CrowdStrike says it’s not to blame for Delta’s days-long outage

Share via:


CrowdStrike refutes Delta Air Lines’ allegations that the cybersecurity firm is to blame for a dayslong flight disruption following last month’s catastrophic system outage, saying that the airline rejected repeated offers to help restore impacted systems. 

CrowdStrike reiterated its apology to Delta in a letter responding to public comments about the airline pursuing legal claims, but said it “strongly rejects any allegation that it was grossly negligent or committed willful misconduct.” CrowdStrike says the litigation threat “has contributed to a misleading narrative that CrowdStrike is responsible for Delta’s IT decisions and response to the outage,” noting that competing airlines restored their operations much more swiftly.

“CrowdStrike’s CEO personally reached out to Delta’s CEO to offer onsite assistance, but received no response,” CrowdStrike lawyer Michael Carlinsky said in the letter. Carlinsky said CrowdStrike had made several other attempts to provide assistance, including an offer for onsite support, but was told that resources for the latter were not required.

“Should Delta pursue this path, Delta will have to explain to the public, its shareholders, and ultimately a jury why CrowdStrike took responsibility for its actions — swiftly, transparently, and constructively — while Delta did not,” said Carlinsky. The letter also notes that CrowdStrike’s contractual liability is capped “in the single-digit millions,” and that the company will “respond aggressively” to litigation “if forced to do so.” We have reached out to Delta for comment and will update this story if we hear back.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

CrowdStrike says it’s not to blame for Delta’s days-long outage


CrowdStrike refutes Delta Air Lines’ allegations that the cybersecurity firm is to blame for a dayslong flight disruption following last month’s catastrophic system outage, saying that the airline rejected repeated offers to help restore impacted systems. 

CrowdStrike reiterated its apology to Delta in a letter responding to public comments about the airline pursuing legal claims, but said it “strongly rejects any allegation that it was grossly negligent or committed willful misconduct.” CrowdStrike says the litigation threat “has contributed to a misleading narrative that CrowdStrike is responsible for Delta’s IT decisions and response to the outage,” noting that competing airlines restored their operations much more swiftly.

“CrowdStrike’s CEO personally reached out to Delta’s CEO to offer onsite assistance, but received no response,” CrowdStrike lawyer Michael Carlinsky said in the letter. Carlinsky said CrowdStrike had made several other attempts to provide assistance, including an offer for onsite support, but was told that resources for the latter were not required.

“Should Delta pursue this path, Delta will have to explain to the public, its shareholders, and ultimately a jury why CrowdStrike took responsibility for its actions — swiftly, transparently, and constructively — while Delta did not,” said Carlinsky. The letter also notes that CrowdStrike’s contractual liability is capped “in the single-digit millions,” and that the company will “respond aggressively” to litigation “if forced to do so.” We have reached out to Delta for comment and will update this story if we hear back.



Source link

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Beleaguered startup Humane drops Ai Pin price by $200

Humane on Wednesday announced a $200 price cut...

Zanzibar’s new blockchain sandbox aims to drive tech startup...

The semi-autonomous region of Tanzania is taking advantage...

October 23, 2024 – Apple gaming app, iPhone roadmap

Listen to a recap of the top stories...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!