Reliance Withdraws ‘Operation Sindoor’ Trademark Application, Respecting National Sentiment

Share via:

Reliance Industries has stated it will not pursue a trademark for the term “Operation Sindoor,” calling it a powerful symbol of Indian valour that belongs to the nation. The company explained that the application was mistakenly filed by a junior employee without approval and has since been withdrawn.

In a statement, Reliance emphasized its pride in Operation Sindoor, which was launched following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam and hailed it as a testament to India’s military strength and resolve against terrorism.

According to Bar and Bench, four trademark applications were filed for the term on May 7 between 10:42 AM and 6:27 PM. Alongside Reliance, the other applicants included Mukesh Chetram Agrawal from Mumbai, retired IAF officer Kamal Singh Oberh, and Delhi-based lawyer Alok Kothari. All filed under Class 41, covering education, media, entertainment, and cultural services—implying potential use as a film, show, or event title.

In India, military operation names like “Operation Sindoor” aren’t automatically protected. Without Ministry of Defence ownership or legal restrictions, such names can be trademarked by private parties unless challenged. However, the Trade Marks Act allows rejection if a term misleads, implies government association, or offends public sentiment.

Early filing doesn’t guarantee exclusive rights. The trademark registrar considers factors like intended use, public confusion risk, and objections before granting ownership. When multiple filings exist, opposition proceedings or agreements may be required.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Reliance Withdraws ‘Operation Sindoor’ Trademark Application, Respecting National Sentiment

Reliance Industries has stated it will not pursue a trademark for the term “Operation Sindoor,” calling it a powerful symbol of Indian valour that belongs to the nation. The company explained that the application was mistakenly filed by a junior employee without approval and has since been withdrawn.

In a statement, Reliance emphasized its pride in Operation Sindoor, which was launched following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam and hailed it as a testament to India’s military strength and resolve against terrorism.

According to Bar and Bench, four trademark applications were filed for the term on May 7 between 10:42 AM and 6:27 PM. Alongside Reliance, the other applicants included Mukesh Chetram Agrawal from Mumbai, retired IAF officer Kamal Singh Oberh, and Delhi-based lawyer Alok Kothari. All filed under Class 41, covering education, media, entertainment, and cultural services—implying potential use as a film, show, or event title.

In India, military operation names like “Operation Sindoor” aren’t automatically protected. Without Ministry of Defence ownership or legal restrictions, such names can be trademarked by private parties unless challenged. However, the Trade Marks Act allows rejection if a term misleads, implies government association, or offends public sentiment.

Early filing doesn’t guarantee exclusive rights. The trademark registrar considers factors like intended use, public confusion risk, and objections before granting ownership. When multiple filings exist, opposition proceedings or agreements may be required.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

No investor will leave Karnataka for want of land,...

Karnataka has enough land to offer to investors,...

How long until Severance season 3? Apple TV+ exec...

Emmy nominations arrived yesterday, and Apple TV+ had...

Kettleborough VC Launches Second Fund With INR 80 Cr...

SUMMARY The VC firm also announced the first close...

Popular

Upcoming Events

IPTV Portugal iptvdfgdfs iptvdfgdfs iptvdfgdfs iptvdfgdfs
IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV