Relief for Paytm as Allahabad HC stays INR 1,081 crore GST demand

Share via:

The Allahabad High Court (HC) has suspended the INR 1,081 Cr demand related to a Goods and Services Tax (GST) dispute, much to the relief of fintech giant Paytm.

On a petition submitted by Paytm, a bench consisting of Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice JJ Munir issued the ruling earlier this month. The issue is whether giving Direct To Home (DTH) and mobile recharge coupons to customers in other states is considered intra-state supply or inter-state supply. Paytm claimed that the issue involved interstate supply, but the Center’s attorney argued otherwise. The INR 1,081 Cr. GST bill, which has since been stayed, was brought about by the confusion.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Relief for Paytm as Allahabad HC stays INR 1,081 crore GST demand

The Allahabad High Court (HC) has suspended the INR 1,081 Cr demand related to a Goods and Services Tax (GST) dispute, much to the relief of fintech giant Paytm.

On a petition submitted by Paytm, a bench consisting of Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice JJ Munir issued the ruling earlier this month. The issue is whether giving Direct To Home (DTH) and mobile recharge coupons to customers in other states is considered intra-state supply or inter-state supply. Paytm claimed that the issue involved interstate supply, but the Center’s attorney argued otherwise. The INR 1,081 Cr. GST bill, which has since been stayed, was brought about by the confusion.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

Accenture quarterly earnings: Accenture quarterly numbers point to strong...

India’s $254-billion technology outsourcing industry, key to helping...

Securitize proposes BlackRock BUIDL fund as collateral for Frax...

According to RWA.XYZ, BlackRock's US dollar Institutional Digital...

iPhone 17 Air suddenly makes a lot more sense...

Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!