Google denies restricting rival apps and calls the CCI order a “unfair imposition”

Share via:

Google said the INR 1,337.76 Cr penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) was an ‘unfair imposition’ in its submission to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). It also denied preventing smartphone companies from installing other apps, including those of competitors.

On Friday (February 18), the NCLAT was hearing the case when Google challenged the CCI penalty of INR 1,337.76 Cr for alleged abuse of dominance across various verticals within the Android device ecosystem. On Friday, a two-member NCLAT bench led by chairperson Justice Ashok Bhusan scheduled the case for day-to-day hearings beginning February 23. Dr. Alok Srivastava, a technical member of the appellate tribunal, also sits on the bench.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

Google denies restricting rival apps and calls the CCI order a “unfair imposition”

Google said the INR 1,337.76 Cr penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) was an ‘unfair imposition’ in its submission to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). It also denied preventing smartphone companies from installing other apps, including those of competitors.

On Friday (February 18), the NCLAT was hearing the case when Google challenged the CCI penalty of INR 1,337.76 Cr for alleged abuse of dominance across various verticals within the Android device ecosystem. On Friday, a two-member NCLAT bench led by chairperson Justice Ashok Bhusan scheduled the case for day-to-day hearings beginning February 23. Dr. Alok Srivastava, a technical member of the appellate tribunal, also sits on the bench.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

AMD working to democratise AI not just for data...

AMD is aiming to make artificial intelligence more...

US startup Lyten to take over Northvolt’s energy storage...

Silicon Valley startup Lyten will take full ownership...

US Senate strikes AI regulation ban from Trump megabill

The Republican-led US Senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Impacted Drivers On Hunger Protest

SUMMARY The protesting drivers urged the local authorities to...

Apple loses bid to dismiss US smartphone monopoly case

Apple must face the U.S. Department of Justice's...

Wispr Flow is an AI iPhone keyboard that transcribes...

This is a bit of a gimmick, but...
ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq ASDFq referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal referal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews almydannews refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal refersal
IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV IPTV