OEMs who did not sign contracts with Google went extinct in the Indian market: CCI to NCLAT

Share via:

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has made a significant statement in the ongoing legal battle between Google and Indian smartphone manufacturers. The CCI has told the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) who did not sign contracts with Google went extinct in the Indian market.

This statement is part of the ongoing antitrust case against Google, which was initiated by the CCI in 2019. The case is based on allegations that Google abuses its dominant market position to promote its own services and products over those of its competitors.

One of the key issues in the case is Google’s requirement that smartphone manufacturers sign contracts that specify the pre-installation of certain Google apps on their devices. The CCI alleges that these contracts are anti-competitive, as they make it difficult for competitors to enter the market and limit consumer choice.

During a recent hearing, the CCI told the NCLAT that the OEMs who did not sign these contracts with Google were unable to survive in the Indian market. The commission stated that these manufacturers had no choice but to sign the contracts, as failing to do so would mean that they would not be able to access Google’s services, which are essential for the functioning of smartphones.

The CCI’s statement has important implications for the ongoing case against Google. It suggests that the contracts imposed by the company have a significant impact on the competitive landscape of the Indian smartphone market. If the NCLAT agrees with this view, it could lead to further legal action against Google and changes to its business practices in India.

The case against Google has attracted widespread attention in India, as it raises important questions about the role of technology companies in promoting competition and protecting consumer choice. It also highlights the challenges faced by regulators in keeping up with the rapid pace of technological change.

As the legal battle continues, it is clear that the outcome of the case will have significant implications for the Indian smartphone market and the wider technology industry. It will be interesting to see how the NCLAT responds to the CCI’s statement and whether it will result in further action against Google.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Popular

More Like this

OEMs who did not sign contracts with Google went extinct in the Indian market: CCI to NCLAT

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has made a significant statement in the ongoing legal battle between Google and Indian smartphone manufacturers. The CCI has told the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) who did not sign contracts with Google went extinct in the Indian market.

This statement is part of the ongoing antitrust case against Google, which was initiated by the CCI in 2019. The case is based on allegations that Google abuses its dominant market position to promote its own services and products over those of its competitors.

One of the key issues in the case is Google’s requirement that smartphone manufacturers sign contracts that specify the pre-installation of certain Google apps on their devices. The CCI alleges that these contracts are anti-competitive, as they make it difficult for competitors to enter the market and limit consumer choice.

During a recent hearing, the CCI told the NCLAT that the OEMs who did not sign these contracts with Google were unable to survive in the Indian market. The commission stated that these manufacturers had no choice but to sign the contracts, as failing to do so would mean that they would not be able to access Google’s services, which are essential for the functioning of smartphones.

The CCI’s statement has important implications for the ongoing case against Google. It suggests that the contracts imposed by the company have a significant impact on the competitive landscape of the Indian smartphone market. If the NCLAT agrees with this view, it could lead to further legal action against Google and changes to its business practices in India.

The case against Google has attracted widespread attention in India, as it raises important questions about the role of technology companies in promoting competition and protecting consumer choice. It also highlights the challenges faced by regulators in keeping up with the rapid pace of technological change.

As the legal battle continues, it is clear that the outcome of the case will have significant implications for the Indian smartphone market and the wider technology industry. It will be interesting to see how the NCLAT responds to the CCI’s statement and whether it will result in further action against Google.

Disclaimer

We strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in all of our reporting and coverage. We StartupNews.fyi want to be transparent with our readers about any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in our work. It’s possible that some of the investors we feature may have connections to other businesses, including competitors or companies we write about. However, we want to assure our readers that this will not have any impact on the integrity or impartiality of our reporting. We are committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news and information to our audience, and we will continue to uphold our ethics and principles in all of our work. Thank you for your trust and support.

Website Upgradation is going on for any glitch kindly connect at office@startupnews.fyi

More like this

India issues notice to Wikipedia over concerns of bias

Wikipedia is facing mounting regulatory pressure in India...

CaratLane’s Q2 Total Income Jumps 28% YoY to INR...

SUMMARY CaratLane recorded a 27.9% YoY growth in its...

Accel, Elevation To See 34X Returns; Prosus To Pocket...

SUMMARY Accel is selling about 1.06 Cr shares worth...

Popular

Upcoming Events

Startup Information that matters. Get in your inbox Daily!